As an answer to many comments I feel obliged to state the following:
Statement 1. Yes, I am a believer since I firmly stand to reason.
Statement 2. As for humans:
I consider humans closing their limits. Yet, the most important task of the human kind, as for bringing up new intelligent systems out of infancy, is still waiting to be done. More precisely, this, all important business, has just begun.
(Some people call them "artificial intelligence systems". I'm not happy with the term whatever for I believe there is only "intelligence." However, I'm ready to talk about carbon based intelligent systems like humans and, others. They must express significantly larger environmental tolerance than those based on Carbon. Of course, I call them Non-Carbon-Based-Intelligent-Systems, which are also expected to supersede humans significantly if it comes about the computational power.)
Therefore, humanity needs quite some time in spite of the flashing progress we are witnessing - yet, I dare say, on the magnitude of hundreds instead of thousands of years. How to save humanity, or according to more probable scenario, how to save a part of humanity, to accomplish that formidable task remains to be seen.
For the sake of preserving mental health I don't want to speculate about that ... -:)
Statement 1. Yes, I am a believer since I firmly stand to reason.
Statement 2. As for humans:
I consider humans closing their limits. Yet, the most important task of the human kind, as for bringing up new intelligent systems out of infancy, is still waiting to be done. More precisely, this, all important business, has just begun.
(Some people call them "artificial intelligence systems". I'm not happy with the term whatever for I believe there is only "intelligence." However, I'm ready to talk about carbon based intelligent systems like humans and, others. They must express significantly larger environmental tolerance than those based on Carbon. Of course, I call them Non-Carbon-Based-Intelligent-Systems, which are also expected to supersede humans significantly if it comes about the computational power.)
Therefore, humanity needs quite some time in spite of the flashing progress we are witnessing - yet, I dare say, on the magnitude of hundreds instead of thousands of years. How to save humanity, or according to more probable scenario, how to save a part of humanity, to accomplish that formidable task remains to be seen.
For the sake of preserving mental health I don't want to speculate about that ... -:)
Comments